Turning off signatures?

Feedback, suggestions and comments for the website

Moderators: Martbfc, damon4president, MrMagpie, Keira

Postby tom_cas1 » Wed Dec 10, 2008 2:35 pm

Alexander wrote:
Trimm Trabb wrote:Alexander's sig is twice the size of the generally accepted signature size - 400 x 150. Nevertheless, we'll leave things as they are for now but I will bring up the point.


All just because mr. Redneck thinks it's inconvenient?


I must say, i'm with you here. One person coming back after 3 years of not being here and then a potential sig ban could be installed to limit the sizes. We haven't had a problem before. No-ones computer screen is small enough to get cocked up by a signature being too big. If the admin can find away for Redneck to be able to turn off all sigs on HIS view of the forum, then ok. But i don't think we should be limited and have a maximum size imposed on us all.
User avatar
tom_cas1
 
Posts: 16643
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 8:25 pm
Location: England

Postby Trimm Trabb » Wed Dec 10, 2008 2:43 pm

Okay, okay, I hear you. I was wrong. Sorry.
Trimm Trabb
 
Posts: 20167
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 2:32 pm
Location: Your garden

Postby Redneck » Wed Dec 10, 2008 3:43 pm

tom_cas1 wrote:
Alexander wrote:
Trimm Trabb wrote:Alexander's sig is twice the size of the generally accepted signature size - 400 x 150. Nevertheless, we'll leave things as they are for now but I will bring up the point.


All just because mr. Redneck thinks it's inconvenient?


I must say, i'm with you here. One person coming back after 3 years of not being here and then a potential sig ban could be installed to limit the sizes. We haven't had a problem before. No-ones computer screen is small enough to get cocked up by a signature being too big. If the admin can find away for Redneck to be able to turn off all sigs on HIS view of the forum, then ok. But i don't think we should be limited and have a maximum size imposed on us all.


Yup, that's what I asked. Read my responses before you post.

kthxbye.
Redneck
 
Posts: 740
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2002 7:16 pm
Location: Tabitha's Island

Postby tom_cas1 » Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:30 pm

Redneck wrote:
tom_cas1 wrote:
Alexander wrote:
Trimm Trabb wrote:Alexander's sig is twice the size of the generally accepted signature size - 400 x 150. Nevertheless, we'll leave things as they are for now but I will bring up the point.


All just because mr. Redneck thinks it's inconvenient?


I must say, i'm with you here. One person coming back after 3 years of not being here and then a potential sig ban could be installed to limit the sizes. We haven't had a problem before. No-ones computer screen is small enough to get cocked up by a signature being too big. If the admin can find away for Redneck to be able to turn off all sigs on HIS view of the forum, then ok. But i don't think we should be limited and have a maximum size imposed on us all.


Yup, that's what I asked. Read my responses before you post.

kthxbye.


No, i was referring to a few peoples comments about putting a size limit on the sigs. No need.
User avatar
tom_cas1
 
Posts: 16643
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 8:25 pm
Location: England

Postby serenity5 » Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:34 pm

Use Firefox as a browser. It gives you the option to block images.

Hover the cursor over the image, right click the mouse and choose "Block images from".
serenity5
 
Posts: 6160
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 4:32 pm

Previous

Return to WWW.BLUR.CO.UK

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests