Feedback, suggestions and comments for the website
Moderators: Martbfc, damon4president, MrMagpie, Keira
by tom_cas1 » Wed Dec 10, 2008 2:35 pm
Alexander wrote:Trimm Trabb wrote:Alexander's sig is twice the size of the generally accepted signature size - 400 x 150. Nevertheless, we'll leave things as they are for now but I will bring up the point.
All just because mr. Redneck thinks it's inconvenient?
I must say, i'm with you here. One person coming back after 3 years of not being here and then a potential sig ban could be installed to limit the sizes. We haven't had a problem before. No-ones computer screen is small enough to get cocked up by a signature being too big. If the admin can find away for Redneck to be able to turn off all sigs on HIS view of the forum, then ok. But i don't think we should be limited and have a maximum size imposed on us all.
-

tom_cas1
-
- Posts: 16643
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 8:25 pm
- Location: England
-
by Trimm Trabb » Wed Dec 10, 2008 2:43 pm
Okay, okay, I hear you. I was wrong. Sorry.
-
Trimm Trabb
-
- Posts: 20167
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 2:32 pm
- Location: Your garden
by Redneck » Wed Dec 10, 2008 3:43 pm
tom_cas1 wrote:Alexander wrote:Trimm Trabb wrote:Alexander's sig is twice the size of the generally accepted signature size - 400 x 150. Nevertheless, we'll leave things as they are for now but I will bring up the point.
All just because mr. Redneck thinks it's inconvenient?
I must say, i'm with you here. One person coming back after 3 years of not being here and then a potential sig ban could be installed to limit the sizes. We haven't had a problem before. No-ones computer screen is small enough to get cocked up by a signature being too big. If the admin can find away for Redneck to be able to turn off all sigs on HIS view of the forum, then ok. But i don't think we should be limited and have a maximum size imposed on us all.
Yup, that's what I asked. Read my responses before you post.
kthxbye.
-
Redneck
-
- Posts: 740
- Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2002 7:16 pm
- Location: Tabitha's Island
by tom_cas1 » Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:30 pm
Redneck wrote:tom_cas1 wrote:Alexander wrote:Trimm Trabb wrote:Alexander's sig is twice the size of the generally accepted signature size - 400 x 150. Nevertheless, we'll leave things as they are for now but I will bring up the point.
All just because mr. Redneck thinks it's inconvenient?
I must say, i'm with you here. One person coming back after 3 years of not being here and then a potential sig ban could be installed to limit the sizes. We haven't had a problem before. No-ones computer screen is small enough to get cocked up by a signature being too big. If the admin can find away for Redneck to be able to turn off all sigs on HIS view of the forum, then ok. But i don't think we should be limited and have a maximum size imposed on us all.
Yup, that's what I asked. Read my responses before you post.
kthxbye.
No, i was referring to a few peoples comments about putting a size limit on the sigs. No need.
-

tom_cas1
-
- Posts: 16643
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 8:25 pm
- Location: England
-
by serenity5 » Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:34 pm
Use Firefox as a browser. It gives you the option to block images.
Hover the cursor over the image, right click the mouse and choose "Block images from".
-
serenity5
-
- Posts: 6160
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 4:32 pm
Return to WWW.BLUR.CO.UK
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests